tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6930445412420969933.post5675961478222881841..comments2010-08-20T13:24:36.427-04:00Comments on duck. duck. gay duck.: A brief treatise on wankingeastsidekatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07375011642061094187noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6930445412420969933.post-20991576302977166722010-01-23T10:09:54.069-05:002010-01-23T10:09:54.069-05:00*reads original article*. Another demonstration th...*reads original article*. Another demonstration that female feminists don't all magically know everything about men and male culture? *sigh*.<br /><br />Wanking may be gender-neutral, but wanker as an insult isn't. There's this idea that men only masturbate because they're such losers that they can't get any women to have sex with them. Using it to insult a women makes no sense - not just because women aren't seen as masturbating, but because the cultural narrative around female masturbation is so fundamentally different. While the insult is mainly British, the attitudes towards masturbation and sexuality certainly aren't.<br /><br />Number of <b>actual</b> unique Google results for the phrase <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.gentoo:en-US:unofficial&hs=Xzh&q=%22she%27s+a+wanker%22&start=40&sa=N" rel="nofollow">"she's a wanker"</a>: 36. For <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.gentoo:en-US:unofficial&hs=S0h&q=%22he%27s+a+wanker%22&start=770&sa=N" rel="nofollow">"he's a wanker"</a>: too many to measure, but thousands at least.makomkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00266600558871564196noreply@blogger.com